What is the main point that Drehle makes? Does the author of the student essay your are considering address that point? What do you think about his claims, especially in light of the quick poll that we took at the beginning of class? How does this affect the author's ethos (his or her integrity; how much faith we have in his argument)? How does this essay compare to Victor's essay?
The main point that Drehle makes, is the inconvenience of summer learning loss. Drehle's states how unprivileged students don't have the same opportunities as others do. I feel like the author of this essay doesn't address the main point of the article because he or she is only trying to focus on the the negative point of view. Its not whether or not they want to attend a summer enrichment program, but its whether they have the money to attend.
This person assures us that the vast majority of students today wouldn't attend a summer enrichment program, but they only mentioned high school students. Some high school students wouldn't attend due to having a job to save up for college. Others may not attend because its the last summer they get to spend with the family before heading out to college.
Yes, school is work and summer is fun, but the more knowledge you have ,the more fun you'll have later on. Having a good education will bring you greater pay, thus giving you the opportunity to travel and have fun. On the other hand, those who decided to not to make an effort towards advancing their education, are now working during summer and not having as much fun.